when the news broke The financial agreement and partnership reached last year between AI heavyweights OpenAI and Axel Springer is good for harmony between the people who write words and the technology companies that use words to help create and train artificial intelligence models. It seemed like an omen. At that time, OpenAI also Agreement with Associated Pressfor reference.
And at the end of the year, the New York Times sued OpenAI and its backer Microsoft, claiming that the AI company’s generative AI models were used in “millions of Times copyrighted news articles, in-depth investigations, and opinion pieces.” “Constructed by copying and using articles, reviews, and methods.” -For guides, etc. ” Due to what the Times deemed an “unlawful use.” [its] OpenAI “can take verbatim content from the Times, closely summarize it, and produce output that mimics its presentation style, as demonstrated in numerous examples.”
Exchange explores startups, markets, and money.
Read it every morning on TechCrunch+ or get The Exchange newsletter every Saturday.
“We discovered and objected to the defendants’ unauthorized use of Times content to develop models and tools,” the Times said in its complaint, adding that “negotiations with OpenAI have not resulted in a resolution.” It didn’t work out,” he added.
How to balance the need to respect copyright and Questions about how to keep AI development from stalling cannot be answered immediately. But the agreement and more difficult dispute between the creator and his AI company, which wants to take his work and use it to build artificial intelligence models, creates unfortunate moments for both sides of the conflict. Tech companies are busy incorporating new generative AI models trained on data containing copyrighted material into their software products. It’s worth noting that Microsoft is a leader in this field. And the media companies that have spent countless hours building corpora of material, reported and otherwise produced, are built into machines whose efforts give nothing back to the people who provided the training data. I’m furious about it.